10/12/2001
Dear (Zarathoshts),
Notwithstanding Gandhi's excellent succor of kinder recourse to conflict; unfortunately, War is the Just and necessary response to certain predicaments of the human condition. "War is Hell" too well says what this horror is.
While noting that America had no Marshall Plan for Afghanistan, impetus for our engagement there seems little remarked. Our contention was instigated in response to a war of (Soviet) aggression (was Reagan supposed to surrender the Cold War to the USSR?). Afterwards, Afghans were entrusted with the retreat of our non-Muslim presence and a chance to take up and employ marvelous known tools of governance already developed and won out through hundreds of years of political struggle in the West and elsewhere: There were multiple players, not America alone, in the sadly wasted opportunity. Among horrific features of vicious dictatorships not least is that the very ones they oppress are also those burdened in the struggles of resistance and overthrow, (especially in the case one thinks governments "of, by, and for the people" ought not perish).
Arrogance Writ Large is not America's in all its sweet naivety and lumbering worldly extension. The Arrogance I oppose is rather that of the genocidal, fascist, disingenuousness of a grossly mistaken, narrow, adolescently rash, sad crew such as the Taliban.
Terrorism is no weapon, but a defeat for its perpetrators as well as a violation of its victims. To do such wrong to others is to relinquish one's own humanity and descend to the depths of ignobility. Pity the perpetrators in their malformed intent and distorted Vohu Mano.
We are tasked to build a world in which a mind-opening, mind-expanding education is given to every child, and where young, malleable minds do not suffer the immense perversion of bright thought that we see in the poor Taliban.
No matter one's cause or aggrievement, to assume sufficient epistemic standing to launch the opening attack we witnessed cannot be acceptable and gives America strong cause for war. With many parts to the claim, the epistemological aspect helps us understand the non-arrogance of America. Human belief can be fierce, but no human can have inviolable certainty of correctness in his or her judgment. Hundred percent correct certainty is often considered God's rather than ours. Thus, social life must guard against this feature of humankind and treat belief more gently than the Taliban and Al-Qaeda treat their epistemic capacity.
Democratic government reduces the incidence of warfare. Consider its long traditions as dividing the force of belief among balanced parts of civic life: There are a real pay-offs to the separation of Church and State, to secularizing the civic sphere, to a federated system of governance, to a balance of powers between the branches of government, to the First Amendment, and to war as an act of State. Such aspects of the American experiment are social structural encapsulations protecting us from the possible fierceness of human belief. We enjoy a social structure that is an outcome of centuries of indeed a humility built into the epistemological realm.
Young Americans will probably, shortly, die far from home in Afghanistan. What is a soldier's claim on mortality and what do our soldiers believe their lives defend? Whosoever shall perish, can I wish all the arrogance of their Youth and their valor?
In our many views on September 11, we can honor our own Spithrodates, the Zoroastrian Youth, who took up arms in our behalf and died 2600+ years ago, as we understand the perplexities brought to humanity in the folly and tragedy of War.
Best,
Natalie Vania